User Tools

Site Tools


pro-transgender-legislation

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
pro-transgender-legislation [2026/03/28 15:14] – old revision restored (2025/08/13 05:09) adminpro-transgender-legislation [2026/04/22 07:31] (current) – Added Montana State ruling fe80:3e9c:dd24:d54e:db69:6233:75bb:ceef
Line 1: Line 1:
-August 07, 2025: Massachusetts Govenor signs bill providing patients and providers in Massachusetts a new layer of defense against out-of-state intrusion into reproductive and transgender care+August 07, 2025 - Montana State Supreme Court affirmed transgender discrimination is sex discrimination.   
 +https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/montana-supreme-court-sb458-ruling.pdf
  
-Jun 15, 2020: Supreme court ruled Title VII doesn't allow employee discrimination against sexual orientation or gender identity  https://www.oyez.org/cases/2019/17-1618+> "Hence, the inability of transgender Montanans to receive government-issued identification documents accurately reflecting their gender identity is fundamentally about the nature of sex and suspect class discrimination under Article II, Section 4––a clause that enshrines individual dignity, equal protection, and nondiscrimination. Transgender discrimination is, by its very nature, sex discrimination"  
 + 
 +- August 07, 2025: Massachusetts Govenor signs bill providing patients and providers in Massachusetts a new layer of defense against out-of-state intrusion into reproductive and transgender care 
 + 
 +Jun 15, 2020: Supreme court ruled Title VII doesn't allow employee discrimination against sexual orientation or gender identity  https://www.oyez.org/cases/2019/17-1618
  
  
pro-transgender-legislation.txt · Last modified: 2026/04/22 07:31 by fe80:3e9c:dd24:d54e:db69:6233:75bb:ceef