Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- transdebates [2025/05/12 03:56] – admin
+++ transdebates [2025/05/26 01:17] (current) – [If I have to allow people to identify as any gender, then I have to anyone to identify as animals/other objects] fe80:4c95:eb05:4241:38cb:0100:e99f:9deb
@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 Some say sex is based on the gametes someone produces. However, there's people who do not produce them.
-Bodies are not teleological.
+The counter-argument is that that someone should be male or female, based on what their body "should do".
+Bodies are not teleological however, are aren't "meant" to produce female or male gametes. They just are. There are people who produce both gametes too.
 Thus, sex is not binary, and there isn't a way to group people into "man" and "woman".
@@ Line 36: / Line 38: @@
 https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article-abstract/143/6/e20182902/76816/School-Restroom-and-Locker-Room-Restrictions-and?redirectedFrom=fulltext
+https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Trans-Bathroom-Access-Feb-2025.pdf
+==== If I have to allow people to identify as any gender, then I have to anyone to identify as animals/other objects ====
+This is a known as a [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope|Slippery Slope fallacy]] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qt4f7QrfRRc).
+This is unrelated to addressing a person's preferred gender and name.
+If you run the argument backwards to as "not allow", then you can run into a bad conclusion too.
+While the argument is valid form, it's not sound.